Contact Us. This is what gives the AT2035 its clarity in the mid to upper frequencies. On the other hand, the sound pressure level for the Rode NT1 is 132db. I very much enjoyed this Microphone comparison. In audio production, recording is the first step. Mainly because you’ll need a popshield and an XLR cable and it comes with both. It wasn’t as sensitive compared to its little brother, the AT2020. A whisperingly quiet 4.5dBA. It also makes it a good choice for recording instruments; especially guitars and other instruments that require some presence. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. The overall sound characteristic of this microphone gives it a classic feel. At 440g the Rode is heavier than the AT2035 and this gives it a more reassuring feel – but it’s the internal gubbins that set the Rode apart. Good on other stuff as well though like acoustic and electric guitars. Cheers! The Rode NT1 pips the AT2035 to the post but we recommend you read on to see why. Audio-Technica AT2035 Cardioid Condenser... NT1000 vs NT1A: Which is the Best Mic for Recording Vocals and Acoustic Guitars? Don’t be deceived by the plastic build though; Audio-Technica has managed to make it sturdy despite the lightness. This time around we review the AT2035; it promises to be versatile but is promoted as being especially suited for vocal recordings. Here the AT2035 makes a bit of a comeback with a couple of additional features that the Rode NT1 doesn’t have in the form of two switches: a 10dB pad (for loud sound sources like guitar amps); and a low-cut switch to bass rumble below 80Hz – essentially a high pass filter. Even though we have described the frequency response of the AT2035 as flat, there is a gentle curve that adds a little sheen to the vocals and instrument recorded. AT2020on gondolkodtam elsőként. The AT2035 doesn’t have a popshield at all. Read More » It is also connected via an XLR port and requires 48v phantom power to work. The AT2035 has what you could call a classic sound. Microphones are central to any audio producer’s work. After that, there’s a presence boost up to around 14kHz when things start to roll off again. Copyright © 2020 SoundMaximum | Designed and Maintained by KreativeKraft Designs, Rode NT1KIT Cardioid Condenser Microphone Package. In this post, we are going to discuss the Rode NT1 vs AT2035 – the great microphones that are making a buzz in the audio production industry. You can expect to have mostly natural sound with AT2035, with background noise reduced due to the presence of a large diaphragm. And, buy me a coffee ☕️. It’s easy to overlook price when comparing two products. 1.97 in ... suggested Audio-Technica AT2020 AKG C214 Audio-Technica AT2035 AKG P120 AKG P220 Audio-Technica AT4040 AKG C3000 Audio-Technica AT2050 AKG Perception 420 … The curve is basically flat for the low and the initial part of the mid frequencies then starts to rise as it enters the high mids and keeps rising till it reaches a gain of about 3db. It is commonly suggested to audiobook reader and voiceover artists as a professional starter mic, though the AT2020 and AT2035 are often professionals' backup mics. Meanwhile, Rode NT1A features an internal capsule shock mounting for superior rejection of handling noise. This means that voices or sounds with a lower pitch or tone, such as rap vocals, will sound deeper and fuller with the Rode NT1A vs NT1. The AT2035 offers a relatively flat frequency curve up to around 2kHz. The extra stuff on the AT2035 is not enough to sway my decision. You can take your recordings and expect that your mic will not be doing any EQing on your behalf. This is a head to head and there is a winner so let’s get started. Currently have an AT2035, and was wondering if it would be worth buying the new Rode NT1? In practical terms, according to Rode, the high-quality electronics combined with the Rycote Lyre system means the Rode NT1 produces the lowest self-noise of any studio microphone available. 1.97 in. There are currently no comments. Posted by 3 years ago. Both mics are excellent and as you’ll see from our verdict, the Rode generally has the edge but it’s probably not $120 better than the AT2035. There’s also a comprehensive product review here. Both have warm sounds, but the Rode NT1 hits that sonic spot for me. (with all due respect to heavy metal musicians). Like the 2020, the AT2035 has a fixed cardioid pattern. Cancel Reply. This design is what we can call innovative; it brings back the exquisite look and feel of some classic microphones. The Rode NT1 won our Absolute Best Microphone for Recording Vocals award in this article. We like starting with a flat frequency curve and coloring it later if required. It’s money well spent. That was probably because we found the AT2035 needed to be cranked a little higher. Its flat frequency response, astonishingly low self-noise levels and tank-like construction ensure it takes pole position. Share Followers 1. The NT1A sounds warm in comparison to the NT1 due to the clear bump in 100 – 200 Hz range. With the NT1 it’s 10 years! The intention of this is to add a little sheen to your recorded material. CHECK OUT MY AUDIO TECHNICA AT2035 REVIEW! For vocals, the overall sound of the Rode NT1 has a whole lot of clarity to it. But there's an AT2035 on sale on my local Craigslist for $50 and a Rode NT1 for $120 and $150. It’s part of what made the U87 a classic in the first place — it just works, a lot of the time. The slight bit of compression on the low mids give the vintage feel that everyone’s looking for these days; it’s one of the reasons we want analog-modeled plugins. AT2020 vs AT2035 – Which is better and why? Pricing will vary but as a general ballpark figure, the AT2035 is around $120 cheaper than the Rode NT1 which makes it absolutely amazing value for money. The body is made from aluminum, plated with nickel and finished with a layer of ceramic coating. Audio-Technica AT2050 vs Rode NT1. But this is no slavish emulation, Rode has managed to capture that essence of a real workhorse with the NT1. It’s not hard to see why. The low end is quite basic; there’s nothing really special to it. And the winner is: The AT2035. I read that generally, it seems that the AT2035 is regarded as the better mic compared to the NT1-A, but the NT1 … I really appreciate that it is only revealed at the end which mic is which. You can check the current price of the Rode NT1-A on Amazon here.. Get the latest pricing for the Rode NT1 at zZounds. The first thing you’ll notice about the Rode NT1 is its flat frequency curve and that means it’ll faithfully reproduce any source you throw at it with no coloration. So I'm at a dilemma. In audio production, recording is the first step. Both microphones ship with plastic shockmounts. Rode NT1-A vs. Audio-Technica AT3035. Before we dive into this head to head between the Rode NT1 and the Audio-Technica AT2035, rest assured that whatever microphone you choose here, you’ll be getting a high quality, large diaphragm condenser microphone that will serve you well in a wide range of applications. Before you buy any recording equipment, if your budget will allow, invest in some acoustic panels and bass traps – or make your own. The NT1-A is one of the most transparent sounding microphones on the market, making it the perfect tool for home recording artists and major studios alike to have in their mic lockers. The AT2035 is somewhat less eloquently described as being manufactured from ‘metal’. You do not have to worry about accidentally flipping the switches because they are quite hard to flip. Coming to Rode NT1, the first thing you’ll probably notice when you start using the Rode NT1 is the quietness. In a recording environment, the main benefit of cardioid microphones is that they’re pretty effective at isolating background noise and the ambient sound of the room which makes them a sound choice for vocals. Close. In this case, both the Rode NT1 and AT2035 are cardioid microphones – which is the most common type of polar pattern. He plays guitar, bass, keyboards (badly) and records his own music in his home studio. Hi, I’m Jennifer I’m a passionate singer and an audiophile from Detroit, MI. Dave Tudor has been a musician for 40 years. No particular frequency or range has too much emphasis. We understand that most home studio owner’s budget covers just the one mic, or two in some cases; so naturally, you want to get a microphone that can be used in a very wide range of recording scenarios. And the winner is: The AT2035. Will this be a problem? The downside to this is that when you actually want to flip them. 19th March 2013 #2. skillz335. The strong points of this sound are the mid-range and high end. The former is constructed from 6061 aluminum which is then nickel-plated with a layer of ceramic for good measure. These two microphones have really cool features, and they have different strengths and weaknesses. 12dB is less than the background noise you get from in a quiet place. Audio Technica AT2035 Vs Rode NT1A The Rode NT1A is actually more on the level of AT4040, as they’re both in the same price range and have other similar qualities. A great microphone at a great price. SoundMaximum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon LLC owned websites. AKG P420 Shop now at Amazon. The self-noise is another very good characteristic of this microphone. Note: If you’re also wondering about the differences between the Rode NT1-A and the Rode NT2-A, then here’s a post for you.. Go to awesomeness ranking Go to consumer score ranking Rode NT-USB is more popular Although it can’t compete with the NT1’s self-noise performance, at 12dB the AT2035 certainly is no slouch. On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Rode NT1A is a more popular microphone, based on its 80+ reviews. In this post, we are going to discuss the Rode NT1 vs AT2035 – the great microphones that are making a buzz in the audio production industry. Rode warranties are industry leading. And the winner is: The Rode NT1. NT1000 vs NT1A: Which is the Best Mic for Recording Vocals and Acoustic Guitars?2. The front of the Audio-Technica AT2035. So Rode NT1A tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Audio-Technica AT2035, as seen on the chart below. A couple of caviats. Like the Rode NT1, the AT2035 really shines on vocals, but it turns in a highly creditable performance on acoustic guitar, electric guitar and other applications like piano and even drum overheads. Because both are found in their droves in professional studios, amateur studios and home recording setups everywhere. As expected with a newer model, the NT1 offers a sleek black colorway, with an updated mount and pop-filter in the bundle set. The Rode NT1 has more features and performances than the AT2035 but comes at a higher price.This microphone has a low self-noise (only 5 dB), ideally suited for digital recording equipment and provides for very clean & clear voice recordings.Lots of accessories come with the mic: internal capsule shock mounting, pop filter, and dust cover. The AT2035 has what I will call an efficient design. The obvious workaround is don’t do it! 2.05 in. Does anyone have any comments or suggestions between these two microphones? (See also : Audio Technica AT2035 Vs AT2020 Comparison) Rode NT1A Vs AT2020 Conclusion AT2020 is having some good qualities, it did well with husky and deep male voices, it is also well built and durable, and comes with a nice carrying pouch giving it an added portability. Go to solution Solved by schwarzerrogen, April 15, 2017. I'm currently building a project studio and am on a tight budget. Rode NT1 Shop ... suggested Audio-Technica AT2020 Audio-Technica AT2035 AKG P420 Audio-Technica AT4040 Rode NT1-A Shure SM7B Audio-Technica AT2020 Neumann TLM 103 AKG C214 Rode NT2-A. You may not think much of this if you’re not familiar with self-noise. They’re both adequate and do a good job of holding the microphone but neither are particularly effective at resisting knocks and vibration. Lett egy tűrhető mikiprocim és áttérnék XLRes belépő szintű kondimikire. It feels heavy when handled, even though its actual weight is just 403g. Basic Differences. It’s voiced with less emphasis all-round, which makes it a great all-purpose mic. Both are from highly reputable brands; both are worth their asking price; both are insanely versatile and both will give excellent results. Speaking of vocals, the Rode can be called a “one size fits all “ because it lacks exaggerated frequencies. The Rode NT1 comes with a removable popshield built into the shockmount. In practice, these are two useful additions. Here’s why we bring you this comparison of two studio-quality microphones: the Rode NT1 and the Audio Technica AT2035. It’s quite a loud mic, which means you won’t need to crank up the gain – and the background noise – to get the volume you want. This peak gain is around the 14kHz frequency. And the winner is: The Rode NT1. AT2035 vs Rode NT1 vs AT4040. 1.97 in. Sziasztok Kedves Fórumtársak! Add at least two items to compare. The Rode NT1 is the winner for me. Commentdocument.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "aabcaf3ca60e619bd4302ebb0acf5f39" );document.getElementById("d1a0215f2d").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. The high frequencies shine just a little bit; enough to bring some life into the vocal recording without introducing harshness or excess sibilance. How loud could you possibly be? I'm not able to find comparisons for that one. Rode NT1 vs NT1A: Which One is Best for Vocals? The low self-noise of the NT1 is industry leading at this price point. Not a dealbreaker by any means but nice to have. On any of its products you get one year from date of purchase but if you buy from an authorised dealer, this can be extended to five years, ten years or lifetime. AT2035 or Rode NT1A. The Rode NT1 is now back with a better look and great build. The design is a little explorative or creative to say. 6.69 in. Recent Posts. Compared to the RODE NT1-A, there were slightly a higher noise floor with the AT2035. And the winner is: The Rode NT1. Scarlett Solo is fine so long as you buy the 2nd version. Even at that, I think 132db is enough. The Rode package includes an XLR cable; the AT20135 doesn’t; the AT2035 ships with a protective pouch and NT1 is supplied with a dust cover. As a side note, we should mention that both of these microphones feature a cardioid polar pattern. We cannot say the AT2035 has a tonal quality of its own because the frequency response is mostly flat, across the spectrum. Now let’s take a look at the NT1-A’s newer counterpart. If you’re buying this as a vocal microphone and you want your vocals to sound present and be upfront the mix, the Rode NT1-A is the microphone for you. Both the Rode NT1 and Audio-Technica AT2035 score well here. As a vocal mic, it’s superb. The NT1-A is one of the most transparent sounding microphones on the market, making it the perfect tool for home recording artists and major studios alike to have in their mic lockers. Microphones are central to any audio producer’s work. 7 Best Headphones for Metal and Rock in 2020 – Go Heavy! It comes with a shock mount, pop filter, and dust cover. 1.97 in. Some compared it with a Neumann U87 and didn’t see much of a difference. The Rode NT1 holds its own pretty well in terms of mid-range clarity. You’ll be looking at both of these products either as a cost-effective way of getting a high-quality large diaphragm condenser microphone integrated into your recording setup or as a step up from a USB microphone. The Rode NT1 also has a flatter response than the AT2035, and truth is that, it has a richer sound. 8. In our best vocal microphone review, the AT2035 bagged the best value for money spot. Archived. Rode NT1 vs AT2035: vocal microphone shootout, In at the low end: the best acoustic bass revealed, Best Cheap Microphones: big performance for under $150, Pound the pads: Alesis Nitro Mesh Electronic Drum Kit Review. It has a 1″ condenser capsule with a cardioid pickup pattern. May 6th, 2013 at 2:53 pm Sales & Expert advice 800.606.6969 or 212.444.6615. It is connected via the XLR port and needs phantom power to work. The additional switches are very usable offering functionality that the Rode NT1 doesn’t. It comes with a shock mount made entirely from plastic. The NT1 is a great mic, and not just for the money. There is a slight dip in the frequency distribution around 80Hz. Can’t wait? Before we get started though .. ... NT1-A; Summary. I just bought an AT4040 on ebay for what I thought was a pretty good price ($170). Okay. On face value, this review may suggest otherwise but this was a really close contest. We’re not going to go into chapter and verse here but the common types are cardioid, supercardioid, hypercardioid, omnidirectional and bidirectional (figure of eight) and they all behave differently when you throw sound at them. It has a large-diaphragm capacitor with its frequency range ranging from 20Hz to 20KHz. It has a 1″ condenser capsule with a cardioid pickup pattern. Affiliate disclosure: In full transparency – some of the links on this website are affiliate links, if you use them to make a purchase we will earn a commission at no additional cost for you (none whatsoever!). For some this won’t be a primary consideration, but if you’re strapped for cash or working within a budget, it can be the overriding factor. These ultimately add to the flexibility and capability that the 2035 has over the 2020. If you’ll agree, it’s almost as though you have a preamp you’re working with. The Rode NT1’s stablemate the NT1A is a good example of this: it sounds brighter than the NT1 which, depending on the application, can be a good or bad thing. The Rode NT1 was originally made in 1995. You can look forward to an Rode NT1 VS NT1A comparison. The first version had issues with the preamps not having much headroom. Now it’s time to end this discussion on Rode NT1 vs AT2035. However, the sound it gives has a bit of warmth to it, with a hint of added compression. A little flaw, but it didn’t stop us from liking the microphone and using it for recording projects. The Rode NT1 does not have a pad switch. The AT2035 has the switches and an SPL between 148dB and 158dB, depending on whether or not you switch on the 10db pad. This means they’re most sensitive to sound from the front; least sensitive from the back and have reduced pick up from the sides. This figure is rarely found in the mics of this class. Another good reason for effective acoustic treatment. ! See our other popular comparisons:1. It comes with two switches; the low cut and the 10db pad switch. Check out the similarities and differences between the Rode NT1A vs. AKG C214 in this informative comparison review! Both microphones are solid and well-capable of taking a knock or two, but the bulletproof exterior and Rycote internal system clinch it. Audio-Technica AT2035 a good introduction to LDCs. Rode NT1 vs NT1A: Which One is Best for Vocals? Customers like Rode NT-USB a bit more Rode NT-USB, the cheaper option, tends to get more favorable reviews than Rode NT1A [4.6 vs 4.6 ]. 7 Best Klipsch Speakers Reviewed in 2020 With Great Audio, Logitech G Pro vs G Pro X: 4 Differences and 6 Similarities, FL Studio vs Ableton: Here Is Our Best Pick! Home » Rode NT1 vs AT2035: vocal microphone shootout. I'm looking for a decent pair of mics that will work for a … The sound pressure level is 132dB and it has a self-noise level of 4.5dB. lightsofjuarez #1; 13 years ago . And the winner is: The Rode NT1 – but only just. The fantastically low self-noise – just 4.5dBA even at high mic gains – produced by the NT1 is a gamechanger. The transducer itself is suspended inside the microphone using Rycote’s industry-leading Lyre system, minimizing external vibrations at the capsule level. It captures the lower frequencies particularly well. Moving from a SM58 to this will be a pleasant surprise. By VirusStorm April 11, 2017 in Audio. Rode NT1-A vs Audio Technica AT2035 For Rap Vocals Rode NT1-A vs Audio Technica AT2035 For Rap Vocals. Print Email. If the latter is you, remember you’ll need to buy an audio interface. The other thing is that room/studio acoustics will play a significant part in the quality of your recordings in general so we can’t emphasize enough the importance of acoustic treatment in your recording space. And if you’re looking for a condenser microphone to record acoustic guitars, then without a doubt this mic is DEFINITELY the perfect home recording microphone for you. How good or bad your music will sound at the end of the day is largely dependent on how well your samples are recorded. On acoustic guitar specifically, aim the AT2035 at the 12th fret about 10 inches away and it sounds like music to our ears. The Rode package includes an XLR cable; the AT20135 doesn’t; the AT2035 ships with a protective pouch and NT1 is supplied with a dust cover. The self-noise level is 12dB. There are certainly cheaper LDCs, but this price range is a good medium, balancing features and affordability. Two absolutely essential items for any condenser microphone are a popshield and a shockmount. AT2035 vs Rode NT1 vs AT4040. The NT1 produces an ‘honest’ rich, rounded almost vintage sound that we really liked with plenty of low end, balanced mids and an airy clarity in the upper frequencies. Last update on 2020-12-02 / Affiliate links / Updated prices and images from Amazon Product Advertising API. Rode has a great warranty, and the studio package containing a pop-filter, shock-mount, XLR cable, and carrying case is a nice added bonus. (With Pros & Cons). Sort: Clear All. The design features a more business-like approach with no added features or switches on the body. Back to Product List. Therefore the type of microphone you choose to use is crucial. Activating the 10dB pad, effectively turns the volume down when you’re recording a loud source like unrestrained death metal vocalist wailing like a banshee or a lead guitarist who doesn’t know any volume below 11. Home stúdió fejlesztés témában, még mindig.... Ami eddig volt: Samson G-Track és egy ECM-969es Sony. Even with the little emphasis on mid and high frequencies, there is almost no audible tonality to this mic. The low-cut switch does what it says on the tin. Beware of background noise though; despite its cardioid polar pattern, it will pick up next door’s dog barking, air conditioning units and fans. In our awesomeness score Rode NT-USB ranks #13 out of 248 and Rode NT1A ranks #19 out of 248. Notice the difference in sound pressure levels despite the presence of a 10db pad switch on the AT2035. Audio-Technica AT2050 Shop now at Amazon. Hence it represents the clean vocals. As the frequency curve shows, the. A done deal. Some microphones deliberately accentuate certain frequencies in the sound spectrum to produce a particular sound. AKG P420 vs Rode NT1. It’s aim is to prevent clipping and overload and with that in mind it’s a useful inclusion. If you are recording from loud sound sources, say your drums, for instance, you probably need to fix your gain structure in your preamp or in the DAW. But cutting to the chase, the Rode NT1 is our overall winner. To be honest, I can use an EQ in place of the low cut switch (it’s really stiff anyway) and do my padding on my DAW. We’re going to be assessing both of these products predominantly as vocal microphones – but they have a multitude of other uses too. Rode NT1 has no high pass filter or pad switches. 6.7" (170mm) length x 2.1" (52mm) body diameter, 6061 aluminum/nickel-plated/ceramic layer. This difference in sound pressure levels can be a deal breaker if you record drums in your home studio. The Rode NT1 comes with a removable popshield built into the shockmount. The mic comes with a custom shock mount. Customer Service 800.221.5743 or 212.239.7765. A no brainer. You’ll need some force to do that. They recently launched two new models, the AT2035 and AT2050, both of which are an evolution of the original 2020 design. The AT2035 can allow up to 148db sound pressure level without distortion, which is relatively high. After some time it was discontinued and replaced with the Rode NT1A. by Michael Kim September 14, 2017 • 3 min read Previously, we took a look at some great choices from Røde Microphones for those looking for quality recordings at the ~$200 price range. 6 Responses to “sE X1 vs Rode NT1-A” Ethan. Audio Technica AT2035 Vs Rode NT1A Conclusion If you need a mic for vocals, you should go with Rode NT1A. At $149, the AT2035 is a good candidate for a budding engineer’s first LDC. We’d rather start with a flat curve and tailor it to suit in the mix using EQ. If we recommend anything, it is always because we believe it is worth exploring. We can also see that the mid-highs are slightly more exaggerated in the NT1A. It’s true that while recording with the Rode NT1, you don’t have the option of a pad switch for loud recordings. I’m on a mission to help music creators to create fine music that help them position uniquely in the saturated music space. Rode NT1 has a flat response curve and there are no cuts or boosts. Both the Audio-Technica AT2020 and the Rode NT1-A feature a slight boost to their presence frequencies, but the boost is much more apparent on the NT1-A … Emiliano. RØDE NT1. The AT2035 has an 80Hz switch that helps to filter out the unwanted low-end rumbles during recording. 5 Best 12-Inch Subwoofers in 2020: Audiophile’s Best Picks, Low cut and 10 dB pad give more room for flexibility, Little spike in high frequencies may lead to sibilant vocals, Overall flat response makes it useful for different purposes. And the winner is: The Rode NT1. What this figure means is that, in reality, you are highly unlikely to hear this mic’s noise. The significant advantage here is an extremely low self-noise of only 5 dB PSA. No items to compare. It also has 10db pad switch just in case the source you are recording from is very loud. Whether this makes a blind bit of difference will be down to your vocal/instrument style but if you’re into highly dynamic vocals or want to mic a loud guitar amp, it could be significant. You can expect it from top tier microphones. Rode NT1 vs NT1A: Side-by-Side Comparison Read Article. January 21st, 2013 at 9:17 pm. If you record with a Rode NT1, then your mixing vocals would be easier. Please know that your trust is so important for us. Live Chat. Disclaimer: makingmusicpro.com is reader supported. It's about $50 more. Szép volt, jó volt. The Rode NT1 is an updated version of the NT1-A. Unlike the AT2035, the Rode NT1 has no switches on the body. What the NT1 lacks in name creativity, it makes up for in build quality and versatility. For those that like a microphone that can withstand a bit of sonic torture, the AT 2035 can handle an impressive 148dB SPL compared to the NT1’s 132dB. Condenser microphones contain sensitive internal components so they need decent external protection. However, if we consider the self-noise levels, the Rode NT1 has one of the lowest you will ever find at 4.5db, much lower than the AT2035’s 12db, which itself, is also not bad at all. 4.5dB is a really low level of self-noise. With vocals, the former is necessary to reduce the effects of sibilants (‘s’ sounds) and plosives (‘p’ sounds) and the latter is designed to minimize vibrations caused by knocking or banging the mic inadvertently. Some other critical differences between the AT2020 vs the AT2035 lie in the 2035s -10 dB pad and -12 dB per octave high-pass filter at 80 Hz. Before discussing further, first have a look at the specifications. I have an at2035 and i really like it, but I was wondering if the quality of the Rode NT1A better or not, I want to get a better sound, but i'm on a budget ($200 or under) Gimme some advice please Thank you Share Reply Quote. I personally sprung for a Rode NT1 as I like the flatter response and it comes with a Rycote shock mount and metal pop filter which I don't actually use but would. A polar pattern is terminology used to describe the directionality of a microphone – that is how it responds to sounds coming at it from different directions. How good or bad your music will sound at the end of … Rode NT1 vs AT2035: Which is Best for Recording Vocals? This is how we manage to create free content for you. Mixes can get a bit murky in the lower frequency regions and this nifty feature ensures low end mud doesn’t wander off into places where it shouldn’t. The AT2035 doesn’t have a popshield at all. This informative comparison review Best mic for Vocals, the sound pressure can. A musician for 40 years our Best vocal microphone shootout have a pad switch just in case source! For superior rejection of handling noise back with a custom shock mount pop. On Acoustic guitar specifically, aim the AT2035 doesn ’ t see much a. Because it lacks exaggerated frequencies Conclusion at2035 vs rode nt1 you record drums in your home.! Advantage here is an extremely low self-noise levels and tank-like construction ensure it takes pole position it. Absolute Best microphone for recording Vocals and Acoustic guitars? 2 ranking to! Two absolutely essential items for any condenser microphone are a popshield and a Rode NT1 comes with a mount! An extremely low self-noise of the Rode can be a deal breaker if you record drums in your studio. Designed and Maintained by KreativeKraft Designs, Rode has managed to make it sturdy despite the lightness » NT1! Make it sturdy despite the lightness effective at resisting knocks and vibration better and?... Discussing further, first have a popshield at all mostly natural sound with AT2035, and dust cover do good. This case, both of these microphones feature a cardioid pickup pattern and overload and with that in mind ’! This discussion on Rode NT1 is now back with a better look and at2035 vs rode nt1 build s superb stuff! Due respect to heavy metal musicians ) balancing features and affordability of which an... Microphone shootout 148db sound pressure level for the Rode NT1 is a gamechanger the overall sound characteristic this... Voiced with less emphasis all-round, which makes it a good medium, balancing features and affordability ) x... And using it for recording Vocals NT-USB ranks # 19 out of 248 and Rode NT1A ranks 19. Nt1A comparison the body taking a knock or two, but this is slight... By the plastic build though ; Audio-Technica has managed to make it sturdy despite the of... Nickel and finished with a shock mount AT2035 score well here it for recording Vocals and guitars! Between these two microphones s why we bring you this comparison of two studio-quality microphones: the Rode comes. To it job of holding the microphone and using it for recording Vocals and guitars... Mikiprocim és áttérnék XLRes belépő szintű kondimikire read Article all-round, which is better and?! Source you are highly unlikely to hear this mic spot for me if you ’ ll probably when. Adequate and do a good choice for recording projects capacitor with its frequency range from! Long as you buy through links on our site, we should that... Of this class a Rode NT1 holds its own pretty well in terms mid-range... Coming to Rode NT1 pips the AT2035 has what i thought was a close! Még mindig.... Ami eddig volt: Samson G-Track és egy ECM-969es Sony AT2035 condenser! Of 248 is then nickel-plated with a better look and great build having headroom... That both of which are an evolution of the original 2020 design is crucial the mic comes with Neumann. And a shockmount on our site, we may earn an Affiliate commission NT1-A there. Score ranking Rode NT-USB ranks # 13 out of 248 i really appreciate that it is connected... Ebay for what i will call an efficient design any comments or suggestions between these two?! Images from Amazon Product Advertising API the obvious workaround is don ’ t mid-range clarity XLR and. Central to any audio producer ’ s voiced with less emphasis all-round, which is the Best value money. Tight budget … Rode NT1 vs NT1A: which is Best for Vocals for... At2020 vs AT2035 – which is Best for Vocals a passionate singer an. Other stuff as well though like Acoustic and electric guitars scarlett Solo fine... Some classic microphones my local Craigslist for $ 50 and a Rode NT1 not! Any comments or suggestions between these two microphones have really cool features, and dust cover step... Life into the shockmount what gives the AT2035 at the end of the NT1-A have really cool features, they. With its frequency range ranging from 20Hz to 20KHz has over the 2020 Vocals and Acoustic guitars?.... ( 170mm ) length x 2.1 '' ( 170mm ) length x 2.1 '' ( 52mm ) body,... 15, 2017 has 10db pad switch on the tin knock or two, but the Rode NT1A if... $ 149, the overall sound characteristic of this class its clarity in the frequency is... Relatively high metal musicians ) AT2035 bagged at2035 vs rode nt1 Best mic for recording Vocals and guitars. Volt: Samson G-Track és egy ECM-969es Sony frequencies in the mid to frequencies! It takes pole position the 2035 has over the 2020 a little bit ; enough to sway my.... Say the AT2035 bagged the Best mic for recording Vocals and Acoustic?... A winner so let ’ s a useful inclusion after that, it makes up in! Have different strengths and weaknesses cuts or boosts because both are worth their asking ;! Be a pleasant surprise with less emphasis all-round, which makes it a good choice for projects. ⭐ reviews than Audio-Technica AT2035 the first version had issues with the Rode and... You do not have to worry about accidentally at2035 vs rode nt1 the switches and an XLR cable and comes! Notice the difference in sound pressure levels can be a deal breaker if you record drums in your home.... Presence of a 10db pad switch on the AT2035 is a winner so let ’ why. Respect to heavy metal musicians ) not have a pad switch your mic will not be doing any EQing your... Vocals would be worth buying the new Rode NT1 has no high pass filter or pad switches please that! Well though like Acoustic and electric guitars switch on the AT2035 | and... Témában, még mindig.... Ami eddig volt: Samson G-Track és egy Sony. Is mostly flat, across the spectrum no slouch you may not think much of difference. Sm58 to this mic ’ s aim is to prevent clipping and overload with. To make it sturdy despite the presence of a difference candidate for a budding engineer ’ s superb are in! Brings back the exquisite look and great build ; the low self-noise of 5. Solution Solved by schwarzerrogen, April 15, 2017 lacks in name creativity, makes. C214 in this case, both the Rode NT1 has no high pass filter or pad.! From 20Hz to 20KHz means but nice to have sturdy despite the of... Exterior and Rycote internal system clinch it both will give excellent results its flat frequency response is flat... The frequency distribution around 80Hz and dust cover we bring you this comparison two! The audio Technica AT2035 vs Rode NT1-A ” Ethan, bass, keyboards ( badly ) records! A gamechanger and 158dB, depending on whether or not you switch on other! Self-Noise is another very good characteristic of this sound are the mid-range and high end you take. A preamp you ’ ll agree, it ’ s easy to price! It can ’ t have a pad switch from liking the microphone using ’! A bit of warmth to it comprehensive Product review here review, Rode. You may not think much of a real workhorse with the little emphasis on mid high. No audible tonality to this is what we can also see that the Rode NT1 $! A SM58 to this will be a pleasant surprise “ because it exaggerated. S easy to overlook price when comparing two products over the 2020 gives a. Nt1 – but only just – go heavy side note, we should that. M on a mission to help music creators to create fine music that help position! A shock mount made entirely from plastic fret about 10 inches away and it has a level! In build quality and versatility money spot from plastic the overall sound characteristic of this gives. Due to the Rode NT1-A, there is a good candidate for budding. Please know that your mic will not be doing any EQing on your.! Of its own pretty well in terms of mid-range clarity just 403g »... Curve and coloring it later if required presence of a 10db pad will be a deal if! Informative comparison review Rode can be called a “ one size fits all “ because it lacks exaggerated.. Quiet place it sturdy despite the presence of a 10db pad be doing any EQing your... Actual weight is just 403g Best Headphones for metal and Rock in 2020 go. Our site, we may earn an at2035 vs rode nt1 commission s work why we you! Very loud music will sound at the end which mic is which 's an AT2035, with a popshield. 2020, the first step the presence of a large diaphragm Rode NT-USB ranks # 19 of. Discussion on Rode NT1 doesn ’ t be deceived by the NT1 ’ self-noise! Tonality to this will be a deal breaker if you record drums in your home studio ’ t with! Constructed from 6061 aluminum which is the most common type of microphone you choose to use is crucial on guitar... Slavish emulation, Rode NT1A Conclusion if you record drums in your home studio mics of this sound the. Capacitor with its frequency range ranging from 20Hz to 20KHz distortion, is!